Wikipedia's reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s but has improved over time it has been generally praised in the late 2010s and early 2020s. Studies and surveys attempting to gauge the reliability of Wikipedia have mixed results, with findings varied and inconsistent. The online encyclopedia has been criticized for its factual reliability, principally regarding its content, presentation, and editorial processes. The reliability of the project has been tested statistically through comparative review, analysis of the historical patterns, and strengths and weaknesses inherent in its editing process. This editing model is highly concentrated, as 77% of all articles are written by 1% of its editors, a majority of whom have chosen to remain anonymous. Wikipedia carries the general disclaimer that it can be " edited by anyone at any time" and maintains an inclusion threshold of " verifiability, not truth". It is written and edited by volunteer editors who generate online content with the editorial oversight of other volunteer editors via community-generated policies and guidelines. The reliability of Wikipedia concerns the validity, verifiability, and veracity of Wikipedia and its user-generated editing model, particularly its English-language edition. Article instability and susceptibility to cognitive biases are two potential problem areas in a crowdsourced work like Wikipedia.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |